Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Credit Acceptance Corporation v. Westlake Services LLC et al
as 2:2013cv01523
Plaintiff:
Credit Acceptance Corporation
Defendant:
Don R Hankey, Hankey Group, Nowcom Corporation and others
Credit Acceptance Corporation v. Drivetime Automotive Group Inc et al
as 2:2013cv01531
Plaintiff:
Credit Acceptance Corporation
Defendant:
DT Acceptance Corporation, Drivetime Automotive Group Inc and GFC Lending LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00624
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00398
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Backus v. C/E Auto Sales et al
as 3:2011cv00170
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Backus
Defendant:
C/E Auto Sales, Charles Edward McVay, Credit Acceptance Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Morrison et al v. Credit Acceptance Corporation
as 4:2010cv00549
Plaintiff:
Andrea Morrison, Andrea Morrison, Andrea Morrison and others
Defendant:
Credit Acceptance Corporation, Credit Acceptance Corporation and Credit Acceptance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Morrison et al v. Credit Acceptance Corporation
as 3:2010cv00549
Plaintiff:
Andrea Morrison, Andrea Morrison, Andrea Morrison and others
Defendant:
Credit Acceptance Corporation, Credit Acceptance Corporation and Credit Acceptance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00921
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00919
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
