Cases 31 - 40 of 123
Alliance for the Wild Rockies et al v. Martin et al
as 9:2017cv00047
Plaintiff:
Alliance for the Wild Rockies and Native Ecosystems Council
Defendant:
Leanne Marten , United States Forest Service and United States Fish & Wildlife Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
California Sea Urchin Comm., et al v. Rachel Jacobson, et al
as 17-55428
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CALIFORNIA SEA URCHIN COMMISSION, CALIFORNIA ABALONE ASSOCIATION, CALIFORNIA LOBSTER AND TRAP FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant - Appellee:
RACHEL JACOBSON, in her official capacity as Acting Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife & Parks, Department of Interior, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DANIEL M. ASHE, in his official capacity as Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
FRIENDS OF THE SEA OTTER, HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE and others
Audubon Society of Portland, et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 16-35953
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AUDUBON SOCIETY OF PORTLAND, WILDLIFE CENTER OF THE NORTH COAST, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE and USDA WILDLIFE SERVICES
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
NORTHWEST RIVERPARTNERS
Audubon Society of Portland, et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 16-35889
Plaintiff - Appellee:
AUDUBON SOCIETY OF PORTLAND, WILDLIFE CENTER OF THE NORTH COAST, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and others
Defendant - Appellant:
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE and USDA WILDLIFE SERVICES
Intervenor-Defendant:
NORTHWEST RIVERPARTNERS
Center for Biological Diversit, et al v. Sally Jewell, et al
as 16-35866
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, GEORGE WUERTHNER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SALLY JEWELL, Secretary, U.S. Department of the Interior, in her official capacity, DAN ASHE, Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, in his official capacity and U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF MONTANA and MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF FISH, WILDLIFE AND PARKS
Center For Biological Diversity et al v. Fish and Wildlife Services of the United States et al
as 4:2016cv06040
Plaintiff:
Center For Biological Diversity , Environmental Protection Information Center , Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center and others
Defendant:
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service , Sally Jewell and Daniel M. Ashe
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
Gallatin Wildlife Association, et al v. USFS, et al
as 16-35665
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GALLATIN WILDLIFE ASSOCIATION and YELLOWSTONE BUFFALO FOUNDATION
Plaintiff:
WILDEARTH GUARDIANS and WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, LEANNE MARTEN, in her official capacity as Regional Forester of the United States Forest Service and U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
HELLE LIVESTOCK, a partnership, REBISH/KONEN LIVESTOCK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, MONTANA WOOL GROWERS ASSOCIATION and others
Gallatin Wildlife Association, et al v. USFS, et al
as 16-35655
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GALLATIN WILDLIFE ASSOCIATION, WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT and others
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, LEANNE MARTEN, in her official capacity as Regional Forester of the United States Forest Service and U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE
Intervenor-Defendant:
HELLE LIVESTOCK, a partnership, REBISH/KONEN LIVESTOCK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, MONTANA WOOL GROWERS ASSOCIATION and others
Conservation Congress v. USFS, et al
as 16-16375
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CONSERVATION CONGRESS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE and U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE
Northwest Environmental Advocates v. National Marine Fisheries Service et al
as 2:2016cv00054
Plaintiff:
Northwest Environmental Advocates
Defendant:
National Marine Fisheries Service and United States Fish & Wildlife Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
