Cases 31 - 40 of 111
Stephen Yagman v. Eric Garcetti, et al
as 17-55697
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN YAGMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC GARCETTI, individual and official capacity, GILBERT CEDILLO, individual and official capacity, PAUL KREKORIAN, individual and official capacity and others
Konrath v. Belkofer et al
as 3:2016cv03011
Plaintiff:
Gregory Konrath
Defendant:
Scott Belkofer, Beth Belkofer and Emily Hollin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hollins et al v. Cordis Corporation et al
as 3:2016cv06740
Plaintiff:
Robin Hollins and Lola Hollins
Defendant:
Cordis Corporation and Confluent Medical Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stephen Yagman v. Eric Garcetti et al
as 2:2016cv05944
Defendant:
Detrich Allen, Detrich Allen, Robert Andalon and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Yagman
USA v. Terry Hollins
as 16-50277
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TERRY CARRY HOLLINS, AKA Caby, AKA Caby-3 and 3
Hollins v. Colvin
as 3:2016cv04379
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Sterling James Hollins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Hollins v. Ford Motor Company, et al.
as 1:2016cv01029
Plaintiff:
Hollins and McKayla Hollins
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and CarMax Auto Superstores California, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Michael Hollins v. Jon DeMorales
as 4:2015cv03019
Petitioner:
Michael Hollins
Respondent:
Jon Demorales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lopez et al v. Alan L. Brodkin & Associates, APC et al
as 3:2015cv01281
Plaintiff:
Stacy Lopez and Antonio Lopez
Defendant:
Alan L. Brodkin & Associates, APC, VFS Services, Inc., Hollins Law, APC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Shelby Phillips, III et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 8:2015cv00718
Plaintiff:
Ellen J Hollin, Odin A Hollin, Manuel Pastran and others
Defendant:
Kinder Morgan G.P., Inc., Kinder Morgan Operating L.P. "D", SFPP, L.P. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
