Cases 31 - 40 of 449
Chaz Higgs v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 13-17146
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHAZ HIGGS
Respondent - Appellee:
DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden, HOWARD SKOLNIK and CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO, Esquire
John Quintero v. Jack Palmer, et al
as 13-16887
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN RANDALL QUINTERO
Respondent - Appellee:
JACK PALMER, HOWARD SKOLNIK and NEVADA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Anthony Burriola v. Nevada Department of Correctio, et al
as 13-16836
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY J. BURRIOLA
Defendant - Appellee:
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GLEN WHORTON, DARREL REXWINKEL and others
Anthony Echols v. James Benedetti, et al
as 13-16823
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTHONY DOUGLAS ECHOLS
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES BENEDETTI, HOWARD SKOLNIK and NEVADA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Edward Finley v. Howard Skolnik, et al
as 13-16717
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD FINLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
HOWARD SKOLNIK, GREG COX, BRIAN WILLIAMS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-16559
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Joseph Antonetti v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 13-16137
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH ANTONETTI
Defendant - Appellee:
DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden, ISIDRO BACH, JAMES HENSEN and others
Zamora v. Skolnik et al
as 2:2013cv00965
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada, Jim Benedetti and Howard Skolnik
Petitioner:
Gregory Zamora
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Rickey Egberto v. Nevada Department of Correctio, et al
as 13-16055
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKEY EGBERTO
Defendant - Appellee:
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GLEN WHORTON, HOWARD SKOLNIK and others
Donald Evans, et al v. Howard Skolnik, et al
as 13-15821
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD YORK EVANS
Plaintiff:
JOHN WITHEROW
Defendant - Appellee:
HOWARD SKOLNIK, DON HELLING, WILLIAM DONAT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
