Cases 31 - 40 of 222
(PC) Davis v. Lynch et al
as 2:2022cv02054
Plaintiff:
Bayard Devell Davis
Defendant:
Jeff Lynch, San Joaquin General Hospital, Diagnostic Radiological Imaging - Elk Grove and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mendoza v. Doubleroad Truck & Bus Tyres et al
as 1:2022cv01390
Plaintiff:
Eluid Joseph Mendoza Doing business as Truck Tire Warehouse LLC
Defendant:
Doubleroad Truck & Bus Tyres, East Up, Q&J Industrial Group CO, LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ho v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv04592
Plaintiff:
Jian-Ci Ho
Defendant:
United States of America and Attorney General United States
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
With-U E-Commerce Shanghai Co., Ltd. v. Global Shade Corporation et al
as 8:2022cv01295
Plaintiff:
With-U E-Commerce (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. and With-U E-Commerce Shanghai Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
Global Shade Corporation, Wal-Mart.com USA, LLC, WalMart Fulfillment Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04553
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03769
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03389
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02904
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
