Cases 31 - 40 of 72
Robinson v. Warden
as 2:2014cv02252
Petitioner:
Carlos L. Robinson
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Anthony Robinson v. Marc Elia, et al
as 14-16859
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY L. ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MARC ELIA, Community Partnership Manager and W. GOEKE, Chaplain
B. Waters v. USDC-CALA
as 14-72545
:
In re: B. BENEDICT WATERS
Petitioner:
B. BENEDICT WATERS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
HOWARD SOMMERS TOWING, INC., HOLLYWOOD TOW SERVICE, INC., LDC COLLECTION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Robinson
as 2:2014cv01036
Defendant:
Cheryl L. Robinson
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Calvin Robinson v. USA
as 14-70956
Petitioner:
CALVIN L. ROBINSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Robinson v. Colvin
as 2:2013cv01540
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Plaintiff:
Eddie L Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
Kathy L. Nagie et al v. HSBC North America Holdings Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv05515
Plaintiff:
Esmerita Alvarez, Hector D. Alvarez, Jr., Tina T. Anderson and others
Defendant:
Does, HSBC Bank USA, N.A., HSBC Finance Corporation and others
E. et al v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 3:2013cv03037
Plaintiff:
C. D.J. E. , Kelly C. Eidson , Matthew W. Eidson and others
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc. , Pfizer International LLC , McKesson Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Fjord et al v. US Airways Group, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv03041
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Fjord , Katherine R. Arcell , Keith Dean Bradt and others
Defendant:
US Airways Group, Inc. and US Airways, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Phillip L. Robinson v. Carolyn W. Colvin
as 5:2013cv00684
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Plaintiff:
Philip L Robinson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
