Cases 31 - 40 of 79
Virginia Duncan, et al v. Xavier Becerra
as 17-56081
Amicus Curiae:
CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS, GAYS AGAINST GUNS, PRIDE FUND TO END GUN VIOLENCE and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER WADDELL, VIRGINIA DUNCAN, DAVID MARGUGLIO and others
Defendant / Appellant:
XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California
Elizabeth Nesbitt, et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 14-36049
Defendant / Appellant:
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, THOMAS BOSTICK, Lieutenant General, Commanding General and Chief Engineers, ANDREW D. KELLY, Lieutenant Colonel, Walla Walla District Comander and District Engineer and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ELIZABETH E. NESBITT, FKA Elizabeth Morris and ALAN C. BAKER
Amicus Curiae:
NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC., GEORGIACARRY.ORG, INC. and CALIFORNIA RIFLE AND PISTOL ASSOCIATION
Ivan Pena, et al v. Stephen Lindley
as 15-15449
Amicus Curiae:
BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE, NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION, INC.,, EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROY VARGAS, DONA CROSTON, BRETT THOMAS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
STEPHEN LINDLEY, Chief of the California Department of Justice Bureau of Firearms
Center for Bio. Diversity v. Ryan Zinke, et al
as 18-35629
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant - Appellee:
RYAN K. ZINKE, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION, ALASKA OUTDOOR COUNCIL, BIG GAME FOREVER and others
Kalmbach v. National Rifle Association of America et al
as 2:2017cv00399
Defendant:
National Rifle Association of America and InfoCision, Inc
Plaintiff:
Kalmbach and Katharyn Kalmbach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
John Teixeira, et al v. County of Alameda, et al
as 13-17132
Amicus Curiae:
FIREARMS POLICY COALITION, YOUTH ALIVE!, ERWIN CHEMERINSKY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVE NOBRIGA, JOHN TEIXEIRA, GARY GAMAZA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
NATE MILEY, in his official capacity, ALAMEDA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, as a policy making body, WILMA CHAN, in her official capacity and others
Barry Bauer, et al v. Xavier Becerra, et al
as 15-15428
Amicus Curiae:
BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE and LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BARRY BAUER, CALIFORNIA RIFLE AND PISTOL ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION, JEFFREY HACKER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DOES, 1-10, STEPHEN LINDLEY, in his official capacity as Acting Chief of the California Department of Justice, XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California and others
Edward Peruta, et al v. County of San Diego, et al
as 10-56971
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CALIFORNIA RIFLE AND PISTOL ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION, LESLIE BUNCHER, Dr., MICHELLE LAXSON and others
Intervenor:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Amicus Curiae:
MAJOR CITIES CHIEFS ASSOCIATION, CALIFORNIA POLICE CHIEFS' ASSOCIATION, ROBERT T. DOYLE, Marin County Sheriff and others
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO and WILLIAM D. GORE, individually and in his capacity as Sheriff
Center for Biological Diversit, et al v. USFS, et al
as 17-15790
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, SIERRA CLUB and GRAND CANYON WILDLANDS COUNCIL
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, a United States Government Agency
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC., SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL and NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION, INC.,
Center for Biological Diversity v. Zinke et al
as 3:2017cv00091
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity
Defendant:
Ryan Zinke and Department of the Interior
Movant:
Pacific Legal Foundation , Alaska Outdoor Council , Kurt Whitehead and others
Intervenor_defendant:
Big Game Forever
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
