Cases 31 - 40 of 87
In re: American Rivers, et al v. American Petroleum Institute, et al
as 21-16958
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CLEAN WATER ACT RULEMAKING
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AMERICAN RIVERS, AMERICAN WHITEWATER, CALIFORNIA TROUT and others
Defendant:
ANDREW R. WHEELER and U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, INTERSTATE NATURAL GAS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA and NATIONAL HYDROPOWER ASSOCIATION
Intervenor:
STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI and others
In re: American Rivers, et al v. National Hydropower Associatio, et al
as 21-16960
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CLEAN WATER ACT RULEMAKING
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AMERICAN RIVERS, AMERICAN WHITEWATER, CALIFORNIA TROUT and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW R. WHEELER and U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, INTERSTATE NATURAL GAS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA and NATIONAL HYDROPOWER ASSOCIATION
Intervenor:
STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI and others
Crow Indian Tribe, et al v. USA, et al
as 21-35811
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CROW INDIAN TRIBE, CROW CREEK SIOUX TRIBE, STANDING ROCK SIOUX TRIBE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
STATE OF WYOMING, SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL, NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA and others
State of California et al v Wheeler
as 3:2020cv03005
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina, State of Maryland, City of New York and others
Defendant:
Andrew Wheeler, R. D. James, United States Army Corps of Engineers and others
Amicus Curiae:
Duarte Nursery, Inc., North American Lake Management Society, Society for Ecological Restoration and others
Intervenor Defendant:
State of Alaska, State of Nebraska, State of Texas and others
Petitioner:
National Cattlemen's Beef Association, American Road and Transportation Builders Association, Edison Electric Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Western Watersheds Project, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 21-35671
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant / Appellant:
DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, Secretary of Interior and BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, an agency of the United States
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
STATE OF WYOMING and WESTERN ENERGY ALLIANCE
Western Watersheds Project, et al v. State of Wyoming, et al
as 21-35673
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant:
DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, Secretary of Interior and BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, an agency of the United States
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
STATE OF WYOMING and WESTERN ENERGY ALLIANCE
Western Watersheds Project, et al v. Western Energy Alliance, et al
as 21-35648
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant:
DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, Secretary of Interior and BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, an agency of the United States
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
STATE OF WYOMING and WESTERN ENERGY ALLIANCE
Robert Swint v. Oregon State Hospital, et al
as 21-35375
Defendant / Appellee:
AM BEST, AMTRAK, 62 BILLION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT JAMES SWINT
Swint v. Oregon State Mental Hospital et al
as 1:2021cv00531
Defendant:
Spacex, State of Oregon, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Plaintiff:
Robert James Swint
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Center for Bio. Diversity v. Scott de la Vega, et al
as 21-35121
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
WYOMING STOCK GROWERS ASSOCIATION, WYOMING FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, STATE OF IDAHO and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT DE LA VEGA, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior and MARTHA WILLIAMS, in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Director of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
