Cases 31 - 40 of 13,489
Carpenters Southwest Administrative Corporation et al v. Debra Reid et al
as 2:2024cv03342
Defendant:
Debra Jo Reid individually also known as Deb Reid doing business as Golden State Specialties, a sole ownership, Deb Reid and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Carpenters Southwest Administrative Corporation and Board of Trustees for the Carpenters Southwest Trusts
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Swensen et al v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00553
Plaintiff:
Roberta Swensen an unmarried woman and John McCarthy an unmarried man
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage LLC d/b/a Mr. Cooper, Veripro Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and U.S. Bank, N.A. as Trustee for Home Equity Mortgage Trust Series 2005-5
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Wilmington Trust, N.A., as Trustee for the benefit of the registered holders of GS Mortgage Securities Trust 2021-GSA3, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2021-GSA3, acting through v. Rafiq
as 2:2024mc00056
Plaintiff:
Wilmington Trust, N.A., as Trustee for the benefit of the registered holders of GS Mortgage Securities Trust 2021-GSA3, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2021-GSA3, acting through
Defendant:
Jack Rafiq
Trustees of the Operating Engineers Pension Trust et al v. Diggers Backhoe Service, LLC
as 5:2024cv00839
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Operating Engineers Pension Trust, Trustees of the Operating Engineers Health & Welfare Fund, Trustees of the Operating Engineers Training Trust and others
Defendant:
Diggers Backhoe Service, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
SRM-Kodiak America, LLC, an Idaho limited liability company v. Pilling et al
as 4:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
SRM-KODIAK AMERICA, LLC, an Idaho limited liability company and SRM-Kodiak America, LLC
Defendant:
Brek Pilling, Scott Pilling, KODIAK AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Erickson, et al. v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al.
as 24-2498
Plaintiff:
JOHN ERICKSON and SHELLEY ANN ERICKSON
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., and its employees and or agents, REBECCA DIETRICH, in her individual capacity, and employee and.or agent for and as successor in interest and the Plaintiffs mortgage successor in interest WAMU other JP Morgan Chase NA, TARA L. TUCKER, notary in her individual capacity and employee and/or agent for other JP Morgan Chase and others
(PS) Jacobs et al v. The Trustees of Princeton University et al
as 2:2024cv01143
Plaintiff:
Joel Brendon Jacobs and Kathleen Chambers
Defendant:
The Trustees of Princeton University, Princeton University Investment Co., Christopher Eisgruber and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Barrett Daffin Frappier Treder and Weiss, LLP v. The Bank of New York Mellon et al
as 2:2024cv01844
Plaintiff:
Barrett Daffin Frappier Treder & Weiss, LLP and Barrett Daffin Frappier Treder and Weiss, LLP
Defendant:
The Bank of New York Mellon as Trustee for CWABS, Inc. Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2006-8, American Surety Company;, State of California Franchise Tax Board; and others
Claimant:
State of California Franchise Tax Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Notice of Removal - Foreclosure
Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan et al v. Element Renewable Energy, Inc.
as 2:2024cv03035
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Defined Contribution Trust Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Health Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Element Renewable Energy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
