Cases 31 - 40 of 893
Shostak v. USA
as 6:2023cv00026
Petitioner:
Roy Allen Shostak
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Shaw v. USA
as 2:2023cv00006
Petitioner:
Buddy Shaw, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Drake v. USA
as 1:2022cv00141
Petitioner:
Mario Juan Drake
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Inman v. Depuy Synthes et al
as 2:2022cv00084
Plaintiff:
Timothy Inman
Defendant:
Depuy Synthes, DePuy Orthapedics, Medical Device Business Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Carpenter v. USA
as 4:2022cv00119
Petitioner:
Steven William Carpenter
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Knapp v. USA
as 6:2022cv00096
Petitioner:
K. Jeffery Knapp
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Venditti v. USA
as 1:2022cv00113
Petitioner:
Charles Eugene Venditti
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Associated Grocers of the South et al v. Cargill, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv00090
Defendant:
Cargill Meat Solution, Cargill, Inc., Cargill Protein and others
Plaintiff:
Associated Grocers of the South, Meijer, Meijer Distribution and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
The Kroger Co. et al v. Cargill, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv00089
Defendant:
Cargill Meat Solution, Cargill, Inc., Cargill Protein and others
Plaintiff:
The Kroger Co., Hy-Vee, Save Mart Supermarkets and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
