Cases 41 - 50 of 2,837
Perez v. AIR International US, Inc. et al
as 2:2024at00421
Plaintiff:
Christian Perez
Defendant:
AIR International US, Inc., American Staffing Service, Inc. and South East Employee Leasing Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Perez v. AIR International US, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01030
Plaintiff:
Christian Perez
Defendant:
AIR International US, Inc., American Staffing Service, Inc. and South East Employee Leasing Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Rogers v. Pfeiffer
as 24-2037
Petitioner:
SPENCER EARL ROGERS
Respondent:
CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, Warden
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02651
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Canelas Matute, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1894
Petitioner:
YLSI ROXANA CANELAS MATUTE, CHRISTIAN YAHIR CANELAS MATUTE and WILMER DANIEL ESPINOZA CANELAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Moten v. United States District Court for the Central District of California
as 24-1858
Petitioner:
SHARROD MOTEN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Interested Party:
CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER
Meghan O Malley-Kail et al v. Chad Bianco et al
as 5:2024cv00654
Plaintiff:
Maya Kail, Leah Kail, Meghan O'Malley-Kail and others
Defendant:
Chad Bianco, Garrett Schultz, Michael Gundry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Ragio-Conrriquez
as 24-1787
Defendant:
CRISTIAN EMMANUEL RAGIO-CONRRIQUEZ and Christian Emmanuel Ragio-Conrriquez
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Ragio-Conrriquez, et al.
as 24-1786
Defendant:
CRISTIAN EMMANUEL RAGIO-CONRRIQUEZ and Christian Emmanuel Ragio-Conrriquez
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
