Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv04743
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Thao v. Donovan, et al.
as 1:2011cv00799
Plaintiff:
Toulu Thao
Defendant:
Shaun Donovan, Faye Austin, Marie Sudduth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00895
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Enwere v. HUD Fair Housing
as 4:2011cv00716
Plaintiff:
Cathy Enwere
Defendant:
HUD Fair Housing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Monica v. US Dept HUD et al
as 3:2010cv01193
Plaintiff:
Lewis, Monica
Defendant:
US Dept HUD, USPS, US Dept HHS and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Jo Anna Canzoneri v. Arc of Hawaii Housing Project Number ( (Nine) et al
as 2:2009cv06938
Plaintiff:
Jo Anna Canzoneri, John Does 1-1000 and Jane Does 1-1000
Defendant:
Arc of Hawaii Housing Project Number ( (Nine), National Housing Trust, Sonny Ho and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Gary J Angello v. Dan Mendez et al
as 5:2009cv01354
Plaintiff:
Gary J Angello
Defendant:
Dan Mendez and HUD California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Type:
Torts - Property
Buesgens v. United States of America et al
as 3:2009cv00300
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Buesgens
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of Housing and Urban Development {HUD}, Kim Kendrick and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Ginn Doose Doose v. IRS et al
as 2:2007cv06223
Plaintiff:
Ginn Doose
Defendant:
IRS, Hud, Alberto Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eden Housing Management Inc. et al v. Muhammad
as 3:2007cv04325
Plaintiff:
Eden Housing Management Inc., Toni Cummings, Mary Louise Green-King and others
Defendant:
James Karim Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
