Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 68
Jose Chavez v. Matthew Cate
as 13-55818
Petitioner - Appellant: JOSE MANUEL CHAVEZ
Respondent - Appellee: MATTHEW CATE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv00623
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Martingale Investments LLC v. Jose Luis Chavez et al
as 2:2013cv00597
Defendant: Jose Luis Chavez and Does
Plaintiff: Martingale Investments LLC
USA v. Jose Sedano-Chavez We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-50572
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: JOSE SEDANO-CHAVEZ
Jose Manuel Chavez v. Matthew Cate We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2012cv01143
Respondent: Matthew Cate
Petitioner: Jose Manuel Chavez
Jose Chavez Bermudez, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-71593
Petitioner: JOSE JESUS CHAVEZ BERMUDEZ and MARIA LEONARDA CHAVEZ PALACIOS
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Roger Hall, et al v. ODOC
as 12-35284
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROGER D. HALL
Plaintiff: JACK DONALD POOLE and JOSE LEON CHAVEZ
Defendant - Appellee: OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Hall et al v. Oregon Department of Corrections We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00275
Plaintiff: Jose Leon Chavez, Roger D. Hall and Jack Donald Poole
Defendant: Oregon Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Mendoza-Valerio et al
as 8:2012mj00037
Material Witne: Victor Manuel Arraiga-Perez and Martha Guadalupe Cruz-Rueda
Defendant: Eusebio Mendoza-Valerio (1), Mario Guadalupe Moreno-Soto (2) and Jose Sedano-Chavez (3)
Plaintiff: USA
Jose Sedano-Chavez
as 8:2012mj00037
Material Witne: Victor Manuel Arraiga-Perez and Martha Guadalupe Cruz-Rueda
Defendant: Jose Sedano-Chavez (3)
Plaintiff: USA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?