Cases 41 - 47 of 47
Bridge Aina Le'a, LLC v. Hawaii, State of , Land Use Commission et al
as 1:2011cv00414
Plaintiff:
Bridge Aina Le'a, LLC
Defendant:
Hawaii, State of , Land Use Commission , Vladimir P. Devens , Kyle Chock and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Waialeale v. U.S. Magistrate(s) et al
as 1:2011cv00407
Petitioner:
Wm. K. Sonny Waialeale
Defendant:
U.S. Magistrate(s) and U.S. Federal District Judge(s)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson vs. City; et al.
as 1:2009cv00411
Plaintiff:
Jonnette Watson
Defendant:
City - HPD, State - DAG, AG, CPS/DHS, State or Gocernment and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Watson v. State Deputy Attorney General et al
as 1:2009cv00286
Plaintiff:
Jonnette Watson
Defendant:
State Deputy Attorney General, Family Judge, Public Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ebinger vs. Office(s) of the attorney general, etc, etal.
as 1:2008cv00402
Plaintiff:
Barbara L. Ebinger
Defendant:
Office(s) of the attorney general, Native hawaiian individual(s) impersonating as A United States Judges(s), Office(s) of the Executive Branch of the United States Government and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Roy v. Association formed in 2007 as conglomerate of indepent 1000+ unincorporated small and poorly financed disadvantaged peoples et al
as 1:2008cv00232
Plaintiff:
Kamal Karna Roy
Defendant:
Association Formed in 2007 as Conglomerate of Independent 1000+ Unincorporated Small and Poorly Financed Disadvantaged People, USA Government Washington D.C., John McCain and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Robinson, et al v. Tripler Army Medical, et al
as 1:2004cv00672
Plaintiff:
Rufus R. Robinson, III and Gretchen M. Robinson
Defendant:
Tripler Army Medical Center, Human Services, Department of, Child Protective Services and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Lillian B. Koller
Petitioner:
Nedra Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
