Cases 41 - 50 of 347
Lance Reberger v. Harold Byrne, et al
as 17-15242
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LANCE REBERGER
Defendant - Appellee:
HAROLD M. BYRNE, J. PARR, R. MONTOYA and others
Hosmer v. Sandoval et al
as 3:2017cv00056
Defendant:
Aranas, Artinger, Baca and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Hosmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews v. USA et al
as 3:2017cv00050
Defendant:
E. Anderson, Renee Baker, Mrs. Barrett and others
Plaintiff:
Felton L. Matthews, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cody Leavitt v. Harold Wickham, et al
as 15-16645
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KFIR HIRSCH
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD WICKHAM, Associate Warden, DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden, L. C. ADAMS, C.N. III and others
Pickett v. Cox et al
as 2:2016cv02669
Defendant:
Bruce Bannister, Brown, James G. Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Marquese Pickett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael McLaughlin v. James Cox, et al
as 16-16869
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL T. MCLAUGHLIN
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES G. COX, BRIAN E. WILLIAMS, Sr., NEWTON and others
Michael Hissung v. Romeo Aranas, et al
as 16-16790
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL DAVID HISSUNG
Defendant - Appellee:
ROMEO ARANAS, ISIDRO BACA, JAMES G. COX and others
Jamal Hendrix v. State of Nevada, et al
as 16-16743
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMAL DAMON HENDRIX
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA, SHERY L. FOSTER, E. K. MCDANIAL and others
Matthew King v. James Cox, et al
as 16-16725
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW J. KING
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES G. COX, Director and QUENTIN BYRNE
Alexander v. State of Nevada Ex Rel, et al.,
as 2:2016cv02125
Plaintiff:
Lamaar Alexander
Defendant:
Black and White Coporations I-X, James G. Cox, Inmate Calling Solutions (ICS) Private Contractor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
