Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv05103
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
James Scott Pearsons Holland Electronics LLC email account jimp@hollandelectronics.com
as 5:2011mj00169
Defendant:
James Scott Pearsons Holland Electronics LLC email account jimp@hollandelectronics.com (1)
Plaintiff:
USA
USA v. James Scott Pearsons Holland Electronica LLC email account jimp@hollandelectronics.com
as 5:2011mj00169
Defendant:
James Scott Pearsons Holland Electronics LLC email account jimp@hollandelectronics.com (1)
Plaintiff:
USA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00286
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dewayne Leroy Jones v. Department of Corrections and Rehabiliton et al
as 2:2009cv07077
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Leroy Jones
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Rehabiliton, Paul Wallace and James Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Scott v. Walker
as 2:2009cv01771
Petitioner:
Clifford James Scott
Respondent:
James Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. State of California et al
as 3:2009cv01699
Plaintiff:
James Scott
Defendant:
State of California, Arnold Schwarzenegger, California State Assembly and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Anthony James Scott v. Ken Clark et al
as 2:2008cv05595
Petitioner:
Anthony James Scott
Respondent:
Ken Clark and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Costello v. Scribner
as 8:2008cv00883
Petitioner:
James Scott Costello
Respondent:
L. E. Scribner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Costello v. Scribner
as 3:2008cv01254
Petitioner:
James Scott Costello
Respondent:
L. E. Scribner
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
