Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Bell v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2014cv01397
Plaintiff:
David Robert Bell
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, M. Glynn, Kyle Seeley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Florence v. Paramo et al
as 3:2014cv00578
Plaintiff:
James E. Florence
Defendant:
Daniel Paramo, S. A. Sanchez, Lara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Theodore Butler v. J. Rivera, et al
as 13-57074
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THEODORE BUTLER
Defendant - Appellee:
J. RIVERA, Chief Medical Executive, J. WALKER, Chief of HC Appeals, RICKI BARNETT, Utilization Review Physician and others
Thomas v. Case et al
as 3:2013cv02011
Plaintiff:
Keith Thomas
Defendant:
Matthew Case, John Doe, S. Pasha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salvador Solis v. Daniel Paramo, et al
as 13-56256
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SALVADOR SOLIS
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, J. CLARK KELSO, Federal Receiver/Medical, K. SEELY and others
Simril v. Paramo, et al.
as 3:2013cv01220
Plaintiff:
Anthony Simril
Defendant:
Daniel Paramo and M Glynn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simril
as 3:2013cv01792
Plaintiff:
Anthony Simril
Defendant:
Daniel Paramo and M. Glynn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chennault v. Morris et al
as 3:2013cv00854
Plaintiff:
Steve W. Chennault
Defendant:
Morris, R. Campbell, N. Ridge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Theodore Butler v. Clark Kelso, et al
as 12-56709
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THEODORE BUTLER
Defendant - Appellee:
CLARK KELSO, Federal Receiver, J. RIVERA, Chief Medical Executive, J. WALKER, Chief of HC Appeals and others
Darryl Dunsmore v. San Diego County Sheriff's Dep, et al
as 11-57141
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYL LEE DUNSMORE
Defendant - Appellee:
SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, CITY OF SAN DIEGO, WILLIAM B. KOLENDER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
