Cases 41 - 50 of 62
Oden v. State of California, et al.
as 1:2014cv00873
Plaintiff:
Derrick Jesus Oden
Defendant:
State of California and Anthony Grounds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dorothy M. Andres et al v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv01820
Plaintiff:
Deeya Quentina Adam, Dorothy M. Andres, Joyce Apodaca and others
Defendant:
Does, McKesson Corporation and Pfizer, Inc.
Derrick Oden, Sr. v. Randy Ground
as 12-57080
Petitioner - Appellant:
DERRICK JESUS ODEN, Sr.
Respondent - Appellee:
RANDY GROUNDS, Warden
Gregory Oden v. CIGNA Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv05151
Defendant:
Benefit Service Center Inc, CIGNA Corporation, Connecticut General Life Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Oden
Thomas Henderson et al v. National Football League et al
as 2:2012cv04761
Defendant:
All American Sports Corporation, EB Sports Corp., Easton-Bell Sports, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Kim Anderson, Akbar Gbajabiamila, Chrystal Gbajabiamila and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv03700
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
5439 South Decatur Boulevard LLC v. Volcano Developers LLC et al
as 2:2012cv00359
Plaintiff:
5439 South Decatur Boulevard LLC
Defendant:
Daniel Itzhaki, Volcano Developers LLC and Oden Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Paul Kent Oden et al v. Providence Health Systems-Southern California et al
as 2:2012cv00116
Plaintiff:
Prakash Beharilal and Paul Kent Oden
Defendant:
Does, Little Company of Mary Medical Center-San Pedro, Providence Health Systems-Southern California and others
William J Thompson v. Mason West Inc et al
as 8:2011cv00683
Defendant:
MW Contracting, MW Engineering, Mason West Inc and others
Plaintiff:
William J Thompson
Oden v. Public Defender et al
as 2:2011cv00558
Defendant:
Nevada State
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Oden
702) 382-5178 (fax:
Public Defender
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
