Cases 41 - 50 of 58
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-16748
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gary Stein v. Ray Mabu
as 13-55609
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY A. STEIN
Defendant - Appellee:
RAY MABUS, Secretary of the Navy
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00424
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-55277
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00023
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ground Zero Center for Non-Vio, et al v. United States Department of th, et al
as 12-36018
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GROUND ZERO CENTER FOR NON-VIOLENT ACTION, a Washington non-profit corporation, WASHINGTON PHYSICIANS FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY, a Washington non-profit corporation and GLEN MILNER, an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, RAYMOND E MABUS, Jr., in his official capacity as Secretary of the Navy, ROGER M NATSUHARA, in his official capacity as Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy and others
Capoyianes et al v. Secretary of the Navy
as 3:2012cv01532
Plaintiff:
Alexander Stephen Capoyianes, Gabriel Robert Villanueva, Wesley Aaron Holtz and others
Defendant:
Secretary of the Navy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-17226
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Philip R Chatman Jr v. Chief of Naval Operations et al
as 2:2011cv00741
Plaintiff:
Philip R Chatman, Jr
Defendant:
Chief of Naval Operations, Department of Veterans Affairs and Secretary of the Navy
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-55125
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
