Cases 41 - 50 of 68
Far East American Inc. etc. v. Schneider National Inc et al
as 2:2013cv05807
Defendant:
Does, Schneider National Carriers Inc and Schneider National Inc.
Plaintiff:
Far East American Inc
Rahier v. Carner et al
as 3:2013cv00779
Defendant:
Aaron T. Carner and Schneider National Carriers, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Timmy Joe Rahier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Morris Bickley, et al v. Schneider National Carriers, I
as 13-80008
Plaintiff - Respondent:
MORRIS BICKLEY, MICHAEL D. PATTON, RAYMOND GREWE and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
SCHNEIDER NATIONAL CARRIERS, INC.
Jeremiah May, et al v. USDC-SAC
as 12-73564
:
In re: JEREMIAH LEE MAY, SCOTT LAWRENCE MAY, GAVIN BOND MAY and others
Petitioner:
JEREMIAH LEE MAY, SCOTT LAWRENCE MAY, GAVIN BOYD MAY and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Real Party In Interest:
RONALD LEE HAAS and SCHNEIDER NATIONAL CARRIERS, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv01733
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Norman Jones v. Schneider National Carriers Inc et al
as 5:2012cv01421
Defendant:
Does and Schneider National Carriers Inc
Plaintiff:
Norman Jones
May et al v. Haas et al
as 2:2012at00934
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Lee May, Scott Lawrence May, Gavin Boyd May and others
Defendant:
Ronald Lee Haas and Schneider National Carriers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
May, et al v. Haas, et al
as 2:2012cv01791
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Lee May , Scott Lawrence May , Gavin Boyd May and others
Defendant:
Ronald Lee Haas and Schneider National Carriers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv01749
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv07445
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
