Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 243
Center for Biological Diversity v. de la Vega
as 1:2021cv00122
Defendant: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Scott de la Vega and Debra Haaland
Plaintiff: Center for Biological Diversity
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
Center for Bio. Diversity v. Scott de la Vega, et al
as 21-35121
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: WYOMING STOCK GROWERS ASSOCIATION, WYOMING FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, STATE OF IDAHO and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant / Appellee: SCOTT DE LA VEGA, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior and MARTHA WILLIAMS, in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Director of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Defenders of Wildlife et al v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv00344
Plaintiff: Oregon Wild, Humane Society of the United States, Sierra Club and others
Defendant: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and David Bernhardt, U.S. Secretary of the Interior
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
State of Alaska, et al v. Scott De La Vega, et al
as 21-35035
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, MITCH ELLIS, in his official capacity as Chief of Refuges for the Alaska Region of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, MARGARET EVERSON, in her official capacity as acting Director of the National Park Service and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: ALASKA WILDLIFE ALLIANCE, DENALI CITIZENS COUNCIL, WILDERNESS WATCH and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: STATE OF ALASKA
Plaintiff: SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL
Safari Club International, et al v. Scott De La Vega, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-35030
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, MITCH ELLIS, in his official capacity as Chief of Refuges for the Alaska Region of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, MARGARET EVERSON, in her official capacity as acting Director of the National Park Service and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: ALASKA WILDLIFE ALLIANCE, DENALI CITIZENS COUNCIL, WILDERNESS WATCH and others
Plaintiff: STATE OF ALASKA
Plaintiff / Appellant: SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL
Willamette Riverkeeper et al v. National Marine Fisheries Service et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2021cv00034
Defendant: National Marine Fisheries Service, U.S. Army Corps Of Engineers, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Plaintiff: Conservation Angler and Willamette Riverkeeper
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1531
Center for Biological Diversity v. Bernhardt
as 1:2021cv00041
Defendant: David Bernhardt and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Plaintiff: Sierra Club, Wildearth Guardians, Defenders of Wildlife and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
State of California et al v. David Bernhardt, U.S. Secretary of the Interior et al
as 4:2021cv00440
Plaintiff: State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Defendant: Wilbur Ross, U.S. Secretary of Commerce, National Marine Fisheries Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Conservation Council for Hawaii v. Bernhardt
as 1:2021cv00040
Defendant: Wilbur Ross, David Bernhardt, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Plaintiff: National Resources Defense Council, Sierra Club, Wildearth Guardians and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
IEN, et al v. Donald Trump, et al
as 20-36068
Defendant / Appellee: TODD T. SEMONITE, Commanding General and Chief of Engineers, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, MARGARET EVERSON, in her capacity as Acting Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: TRANSCANADA KEYSTONE PIPELINE, LP and TC ENERGY CORPORATION
Plaintiff / Appellant: INDIGENOUS ENVIRONMENTAL NETWORK and NORTH COAST RIVERS ALLIANCE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?