Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 140
Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County, OK et al v. McKinsey & Company Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv06354
Plaintiff: Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County, OK, Board of County Commissioners of Ottawa County, OK, Board of County Commissioners of Delaware County, OK and others
Defendant: McKinsey & Company Inc., McKinsey Holdings, Inc., McKinsey & Company Inc. United States and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
FULTON COUNTY, GA et al v. McKinsey & Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2022mc80288
Plaintiff: FULTON COUNTY, GA, DEKALB COUNTY, GA, HENRY COUNTY, GA and others
Defendant: McKinsey & Company, Inc., McKinsey Holdings, Inc., McKinsey & Company, Inc. United States and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Hayder v. Embassy of the United Arab Emirates, Washington, D.C. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv05219
Plaintiff: Dhia Hayder
Defendant: Embassy of the United Arab Emirates, Washington, D.C. and Abu Dhabi National Oil Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gooding County, Idaho et al v. McKinsey & Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv05020
Plaintiff: Gooding County, Idaho and Camas County, Idaho
Defendant: McKinsey & Company, Inc., McKinsey Holdings, Inc., McKinsey & Company Inc. United States and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
City of Auburn et al v. McKinsey & Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv04892
Plaintiff: City of Auburn, City of Waterville, Me, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, M City of Bangor, Me and others
Defendant: McKinsey & Company, Inc., McKinsey Holdings, Inc., McKinsey & Company, Inc. United States and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Osage Nation of Oklahoma v. McKinsey & Company Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv03994
Plaintiff: Osage Nation of Oklahoma
Defendant: McKinsey & Company Inc., McKinsey Holdings, Inc., McKinsey & Company Inc. United States and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Hancock County Board of Education et al v. McKinsey & Company, Inc. et al (TV2)
as 3:2022cv02940
Plaintiff: Hancock County Board of Education and Hamblen County Board of Education
Defendant: McKinsey & Company Inc., McKinsey Holdings, Inc., McKinsey & Company Inc. United States and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Emery County v. McKinsey & Company et al
as 3:2022cv02149
Plaintiff: Emery County
Defendant: McKinsey & Company, McKinsey Holdings, McKinsey & Company Inc. United States and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Cache County et al v. McKinsey & Company et al
as 3:2022cv02144
Plaintiff: Cache County and Rich County
Defendant: McKinsey & Company, McKinsey Holdings, McKinsey & Company Inc. United States and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Weber County v. McKinsey & Company et al
as 3:2022cv02148
Plaintiff: Weber County
Defendant: McKinsey & Company, McKinsey Holdings, McKinsey & Company Inc. United States and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?