Cases 51 - 60 of 73
Peggy Richan v. Fleetwood Motor Homes et al
as 2:2008cv06790
Plaintiff:
Peggy Richan
Defendant:
Caterpillar Inc., Freightliner LLC, Fleetwood Motor Homes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
v. Caterpillar Inc.
as 1:2008at00495
Defendant:
Caterpillar Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Wohlgemuth, et al v. Caterpillar Inc.
as 1:2008cv01279
Defendant:
Caterpillar Inc.
Plaintiff:
Gloria M. Wohlgemuth and Richard L. Wohlgemuth
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Frank Harlan v. Country Coach, et al
as 08-56087
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK HARLAN
Defendant:
COUNTRY COACH
Defendant - Appellee:
CATERPILLAR, INC.
Warmington v. Fleetwood Motor Homes of Indiana Inc et al
as 8:2008cv00471
Defendant:
Does 1 through 20, Caterpillar Inc, Freightliner Custom Chassis Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Bill Warmington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2008cv00045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Orndorf v. Caterpillar, Inc.
as 5:2008cv01276
Defendant:
Caterpillar, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Orndorf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
James Christian v. Monaco Coach Corporation et al
as 8:2008cv00141
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Attorney Settlement Officer
Plaintiff:
James Christian
Defendant:
Caterpillar Inc and Monaco Coach Corporation
3Rd Party Defendant:
ROES, Honeywell Turbo Technologies, Honeywell International Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doris Stephens et al v. Country Coach LLC et al
as 2:2008cv00782
Defendant:
Caterpillar Inc. and Country Coach LLC
Plaintiff:
Doris Stephens and Jack Stephens
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Riches v. Caterpillar Inc.
as 3:2008cv00401
Defendant:
Caterpillar Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
