Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 51 - 60 of 300
Countrywide Financial Corp., et al v. USDC-CALA
as 12-73549
Not Classified By Court: In re: COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS INC, BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION and others
Petitioner: COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation doing business in the State of California, COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS INC, a New York corporation and BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation doing business in the State of California
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Herbert Burkart, et al v. Global Advisory Group, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-35886
Plaintiff - Appellant: HERBERT BURKART, individually and TANJA M BURKART, individually and the marital community thereof
Defendant: GLOBAL ADVISORY GROUP, INC., a Washington corporation
Defendant - Appellee: MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation, BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP, a foreign corporation, BANK OF AMERICA NA, a national bank and others
91 Magnolia, LLC, et al v. N. Verdugo 127, LLC, et al
as 12-17373
Plaintiff - Appellant: 91 MAGNOLIA, LLC, a California limited liability company, 92 MAGNOLIA, LLC, a California limited liability company, 4837 BEVERLY BLVD., LLC, a California limited liability company and others
Defendant - Appellee: JACKSON DEMARCO TIDUS PECKENPAUGH, a law corporation, ROGER M. FRANKS, an individual, JEFFERY JACKSON ASTARABADI, an individual and others
Defendant: COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, MAY SHALHOUB, an individual, BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, successor in interest Countrywide Financial Corporation and others
Sickler et al v. Countrywide Financial Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv01684
Plaintiff: Tony Sickler and German Rojas
Defendant: Countrywide Financial Corporation, Bank of America, Quality Loan Services Corps and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as receiver for Guaranty Bank v. Countrywide Securities Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv08558
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation, CWALT, Inc., Countrywide Financial Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Countrywide Securities Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv08317
Plaintiff: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Petitioner: Darren Bigby and Tonya Lybrand
Defendant: Countrywide Financial Corporation, Bank of America Corporation, CWALT Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Countrywide Securities Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv06911
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation, Barclays Capital Inc, CWALT Inc and others
Plaintiff: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Felicia Brashears v. Bank of America Home Loans et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv06760
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., CWALT, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Felicia Brashears
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Countrywide Financial Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv06692
Defendant: Countrywide Financial Corporation, CWALT, Inc., Countrywide Securities Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Craig Hart v. Bank of America, N.A., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-56434
Plaintiff - Appellant: CRAIG HART
Defendant - Appellee: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., sued erroneously as Bank of America Home Loans, COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION and BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?