Cases 51 - 60 of 555
The Indirect Purchaser Settlem, et al v. Samsung Electronics Company Lt, et al
as 14-16361
:
In re: DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY (DRAM) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THE INDIRECT PURCHASER SETTLEMENT CLASS and THE GOVERNMENT PURCHASER PLAINTIFF CLASSES
Objector - Appellant:
DAVID C. MARLOW
Defendant - Appellee:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY LTD., WINBOND ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG and others
The Indirect Purchaser Settlem, et al v. Samsung Electronics Company Lt, et al
as 14-16364
:
In re: DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY (DRAM) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THE INDIRECT PURCHASER SETTLEMENT CLASS and THE GOVERNMENT PURCHASER PLAINTIFF CLASSES
Objector - Appellant:
BARBARA COCHRAN, JAMES GLASE and BRYAN MARCUS
Defendant - Appellee:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY LTD., WINBOND ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG and others
The Indirect Purchaser Settlem, et al v. Samsung Electronics Company Lt, et al
as 14-16360
:
In re: DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY (DRAM) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THE INDIRECT PURCHASER SETTLEMENT CLASS and THE GOVERNMENT PURCHASER PLAINTIFF CLASSES
Objector - Appellant:
NORMAN D. PALMER and ESTATE OF FERN COOK
Defendant - Appellee:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY LTD., WINBOND ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG and others
The Indirect Purchaser Settlem, et al v. Samsung Electronics Company Lt, et al
as 14-16342
:
In re: DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY (DRAM) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THE INDIRECT PURCHASER SETTLEMENT CLASS and THE GOVERNMENT PURCHASER PLAINTIFF CLASSES
Objector - Appellant:
SEAN KENNETH HULL, RAYMOND FRANCIS CAMPBELL and SUPEROXYGEN, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY LTD., WINBOND ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG and others
Crago et al v. Mitsubishi Electric Corporation et al
as 3:2014cv02058
Plaintiff:
Crago , Arch Electronics, Inc , Meijer, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Mitsubishi Electric Corporation , Technicolor USA, Inc., Technicolor SA and others
Miscellaneou:
Samsung SDI America, Inc., Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Samsung SDI Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. and others
Pecial_master:
Vaughn R. Walker
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Best Buy Co., Inc. et al v. Technicolor SA et al
as 3:2013cv05264
Plaintiff:
Best Buy Co., Inc. , Best Buy Purchasing LLC , Best Buy Enterprise Services, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Technicolor SA, Technicolor USA, Inc., Videocon Industries, Ltd. and others
Miscellaneou:
Samsung SDI America Inc , SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD , Samsung SDI (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Sears, Roebuck and Co. et al v. Technicolor SA et al
as 3:2013cv05262
Plaintiff:
Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Kmart Corp
Defendant:
Technicolor SA, Technicolor USA, Inc., Videocon Industries, Ltd. and others
Miscellaneou:
MT Picture Display Co., Ltd. , Panasonic Corporation of North America , Panasonic Corporation (f/k/a Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.) and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Siegel v. Technicolor SA et al
as 3:2013cv05261
Plaintiff:
Alfred H. Siegel
Defendant:
Technicolor SA, Technicolor USA, Inc., Videocon Industries, Ltd. and others
Miscellaneou:
Hitachi, Ltd , Hitachi Displays, Ltd (n/k/a/ Japan Display Inc. , Hitachi America, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 13-80210
Defendant - Petitioner:
TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC, TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Plaintiff - Respondent:
INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS, DIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS, DIRECT ACTION PLAINTIFFS and others
In re: Ira Connor, et al v. LG Display Co., Ltd., et al
as 13-16793
:
In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff - Appellee:
INDIRECT PLAINTIFF CLASS
Objector - Appellant:
IRA CONNOR ERWIN, LUIS MARIO SANTANA and STEFAN REST
Defendant - Appellee:
LG DISPLAY CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SHARP CORPORATION and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
