Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 51 - 60 of 3,175
Sivak v. Nelson, et al.
as 24-1352
Plaintiff: LACEY SIVAK
Defendant: PATRICK J. BUMATAY, CIRCUIT JUDGE and RYAN D. NELSON, CIRCUIT JUDGE
Sivak v. Bennett, et al.
as 24-1351
Plaintiff: LACEY SIVAK
Defendant: MARK J. BENNETT, CIRCUIT JUDGE and WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, CIRCUIT JUDGE
Sivak v. Friedland, et al.
as 24-1350
Plaintiff: LACEY SIVAK
Defendant: MICHELLE T. FRIEDLAND, CIRCUIT JUDGE and JENNIFER SUNG, CIRCUIT JUDGE
Sivak v. Fletcher, et al.
as 24-1357
Plaintiff: LACEY SIVAK
Defendant: WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, CIRCUIT JUDGE and MARK J. BENNETT, CIRCUIT JUDGE
Sivak v. Fitzgerald, et al.
as 24-1360
Plaintiff: LACEY SIVAK
Defendant: LISA FITZGERALD, BRIDGET S. BADE, CIRCUIT JUDGE, KENNETH K. LEE, CIRCUIT JUDGE and others
Ballester v. Miller et al
as 3:2024cv00454
Plaintiff: Eleanor Ballester
Defendant: Judge Laura H. Miller, Presiding Judge Maureen F. Hallahan, Judge CJ Mody and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Yasmintheresa Garsiyya Bey v. Marie Elena Wood et al
as 5:2024cv00468
Plaintiff: Yasmintheresa Garsiyya Bey
Defendant: Judge Marie Elena Wood, Attorney Michelle Brooker, Couper Smith Hagans and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Dawoud, et al. v. Kronstadt
as 24-1131
Petitioner: FREDDY DAWOUD
Respondent: Hon. Judge JESSICA KRONSTADT, Superior court of California, County of Los Angeles
Cannon v. Harris, et al.
as 24-981
Plaintiff: TYRRALL FARROW CANNON
Defendant: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, DEBRA HARRIS, Judge, individual and official capacity and others
Ou-Young v. Alameda County Sheriff's Office et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024mc80045
Plaintiff: Kuang-Bao Paul Ou-Young
Defendant: Alameda County Sheriff's Office, Gregory J. Ahern, Alameda County Santa Rita Jail and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?