Cases 61 - 70 of 53,964
Bullard #093272 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00948
Petitioner:
Jason Corey Bullard
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell, Gerald Thompson and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Purcell #319445 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv01455
Petitioner:
Donald Wade Purcell
Respondent:
Ryan F Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez-Lopez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3750
Petitioner:
MARIA GLADYS RODRIGUEZ-LOPEZ and ASHLY ESTEFANY ESCALANTE-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Carpio-Savala v. Garland
as 24-3753
Petitioner:
VICTOR CARPIO-SAVALA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cardona Garcia v. Garland
as 24-3759
Petitioner:
SERGIO ALEXANDER CARDONA GARCIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Castillo Hurtado, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3734
Petitioner:
RICHARD CASTILLO HURTADO, DANIELA CRUZ, RICHARD CASTILLO CRUZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rafael-Diego, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3722
Petitioner:
EULALIA RAFAEL-DIEGO, ALEXANDER GREGORIO-RAFAEL and ZAYRA GREGORIO-RAFAEL
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Vaca Cedeno, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3724
Petitioner:
EDWIN JAVIER VACA CEDENO, EVELYN AURORA ZURITA MORALES and MILEY JASLEEM VACA ZURITA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Garcia Reyes, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3727
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO JAVIER GARCIA REYES, I and MARIA DEL SOCORRO MENDEZ BAUTISTA, I
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gabarrete-Lopez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3723
Petitioner:
ERLIN MARILIN GABARRETE-LOPEZ, GENESIS NICOLLE VALLECILLO-GABARRETE and MARILIN FERNANDA VALLECILLO-GABARRETE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
