Cases 61 - 70 of 86
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Martinez et al
as 1:2010cv01713
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Maria E. Martinez and Marcos J. Solis
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
Mattox v. Castrol, et al.
as 1:2010cv01641
Plaintiff:
John Dean Mattox
Defendant:
Castrol, E. Martinez, Marquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timothy Holz v. Robert McFadden, et al
as 10-56300
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY EDWARD HOLZ
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT E MCFADDEN, Regional Director, J. L. NORWOOD, FCC Warden, HODAK, Captain, SLA and others
Timothy Holz v. Robert McFadden, et al
as 10-55954
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY EDWARD HOLZ
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT E MCFADDEN, Regional Director, J. L. NORWOOD, FCC Warden, HODAK, Captain, SLA and others
Leonard Hadley v. Scwarzenegger et al
as 2:2010cv00704
Plaintiff:
Leonard Hadley
Defendant:
E. Martinez, E. Martinez, Arnold Schwarzenegger and others
Diaz v. Guerra et al
as 5:2009cv02984
Plaintiff:
Andres Luis Diaz
Defendant:
D. Guerra, A. Vasquez, E. Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2009at00439
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Martinez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Martinez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2009cv01006
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Martinez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
USA v. Mario Martinez-Moctezuma
as 09-30226
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARIO E. MARTINEZ-MOCTEZUMA, also known as Mario E Martinez-Montezuma
Squires v. iShares Trust et al
as 3:2009cv02077
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Squires, Kathryn Squires, Kathryn Squires and others
Defendant:
iShares Trust, Barclays Global Fund Advisors, Barclays Global Investors, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
