Cases 61 - 70 of 454
G&G Closed Circuit Events LLC v. Quihui Carranza et al
as 2:2022cv00771
Plaintiff:
G&G Closed Circuit Events LLC
Defendant:
Michael Alan Quihui Carranza individually and doing business as La Santisima Nightclub, Cruz Adalberto Quihui Carranza individually and doing business as La Santisima Nightclub and La Santisima Nightclub LLC an unknown business entity doing business as La Santisima Nightclub
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Communications Act of 1934
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Arias Alfaro et al
as 1:2022at00319
Plaintiff:
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Jorge Luis Arias Alfaro individually and d/b/a Mercado Carniceria Del Valle and Jose B Salazar individually and d/b/a Mercado Carniceria Del Valle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Arias Alfaro et al
as 1:2022cv00543
Plaintiff:
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Jorge Luis Arias Alfaro individually Doing business as Mercado Carniceria Del Valle and Jose B Salazar individually Doing business as Mercado Carniceria Del Valle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Gonzalez Ruvalcaba
as 8:2022cv00927
Plaintiff:
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC and G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Jose Manuel Gonzalez Ruvalcaba individually and d/b/a Las Vegas Bar and Jose Manuel Gonzalez Ruvalcaba individually doing business as Las Vegas Bar
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521 Violations of Cable Communications Act of 1984
G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Vasquez Lopez
as 2:2022cv03000
Plaintiff:
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC and G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Leocadio Vasquez Lopez individually and d/b/a Hawleywood's Barbershop and Leocadio Vasquez Lopez individually doing business as Haleywoods Barbershop
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521 Violations of Cable Communications Act of 1984
G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Anthony Huong Quoc Trang et al
as 2:2022cv02996
Plaintiff:
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC and G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Anthony Huong Quoc Trang individually and d/b/a Mariscos Sinaloa, Cristina Arroyo Ramirez individually and d/b/a Mariscos Sinaloa, Anthony Huong Quoc Trang individually and doing business as Mariscos Sinaloa and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521 Violations of Cable Communications Act of 1984
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Gonzalez Ruvalcaba
as 8:2022cv00926
Plaintiff:
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Jose Manuel Gonzalez Ruvalcaba individually and d/b/a Las Vegas Bar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Rodriguez et al
as 4:2022cv02609
Plaintiff:
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Omar Ontiveros Rodriguez, Rosalinda Rodriguez, Omar Ontiveros Rodriguez individually doing business as La Quinta Pizza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
G & G Closed Circuit Events LLC v. Gutierrez et al
as 2:2022cv00714
Plaintiff:
G & G Closed Circuit Events LLC
Defendant:
Ramon Gutierrez individually and doing business as Taco Monster, Gabriela Gutierrez individually and doing business as Taco Monster and Taco Monster LLC an unknown business entity and doing business as Taco Monster
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Communications Act of 1934
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Jared A. Aguilar et al
as 2:2022cv02731
Plaintiff:
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Jared A. Aguilar individually and d/b/a Mariscos El Pescado Loco, Mariscos El Pescado Loco, Inc. an unknown business entity d/b/a Mariscos El Pescado Loco, Jared A. Aguilar individually doing business as Mariscos El Pescado Loco and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521 Violations of Cable Communications Act of 1984
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
