Cases 61 - 70 of 1,392
Kathy Jorgensen v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2022cv01136
Plaintiff:
Kathy Jorgensen
Defendant:
County of Riverside, a legal subdivision of the State of California, County of Riverside and Does 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04553
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04223
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
AW Associates et al v. Tanknology Inc et al
as 5:2022cv00932
Plaintiff:
Kathy Wilkerson and AW Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Tanknology Inc, Allen Porter and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Hansen v. Plantronics, Inc. et al
as 5:2022cv02989
Plaintiff:
Dale Hansen
Defendant:
Plantronics, Inc., Dave Shull, Robert C. Hagerty and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00806
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Sanchez v. Dixon et al
as 3:2022cv02802
Plaintiff:
Vincent E Sanchez
Defendant:
Jennifer Dixon, Kevin Robinson, Kathy Collings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022at00482
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Kathy Quiroz v. Walgreen Co.
as 5:2022cv00802
Plaintiff:
Kathy Quiroz
Defendant:
Walgreen Co. and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
