Cases 61 - 70 of 6,838
Cahill, et al. v. NIKE, Inc.
as 24-2199
Plaintiff:
KELLY CAHILL, HEATHER HENDER, SARA JOHNSTON and others
Intervenor:
INSIDER INC., ADVANCE LOCAL MEDIA, LLC and AMERICAN CITY BUSINESS JOURNALS
Defendant:
NIKE, INC.
Osborne v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Kelly Lee Osborne
Defendant:
Comm. of Soc. Sec. Martin O'Malley and Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2024cv00427
Plaintiff:
Kelly Johnson
Defendant:
C.R. BARD, INC., and Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. CR Bard Inc et al
as 3:2024cv05248
Plaintiff:
Kelly Johnson
Defendant:
CR Bard Inc and Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States of America v. Kelly
as 24-1825
Defendant:
HARLAN LEROY KELLY, JR. and Harlan Kelly
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Kelly et al v. Scottsdale Insurance Company et al
as 5:2024cv01887
Plaintiff:
Mark Kelly, Kelly's Management MS, Inc. and Southwest Concessions, Inc.
Defendant:
Scottsdale Insurance Company and Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Packwood, et al. v. County of Contra Costa, et al.
as 24-1760
Plaintiff:
TAYLOR PACKWOOD and ANDREA WOOD
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, CONTRA COSTA CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, OFFICE OF THE CONTRA COSTA SHERIFF and others
Kelly v. Banner Health et al
as 2:2024at00358
Plaintiff:
Vincent Kelly
Defendant:
Banner Health and BH Corporate Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
(PC) Duley v. Rizk et al
as 1:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Kelly Duley
Defendant:
Rizk and Medical Supervisor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Duley v. Venegas et al
as 1:2024cv00346
Plaintiff:
Kelly Duley
Defendant:
Venegas, Sandoval and Simpson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
