Cases 61 - 70 of 76
Moynihan v. Department of Licensing State of Washington
as 2:2011cv00270
Plaintiff:
Michael Francis Moynihan, Jr
Defendant:
Department of Licensing State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moynihan v. Wisman
as 2:2011cv00269
Plaintiff:
Michael Francis Moynihan, Jr
Defendant:
Jay F Wisman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moynihan v. Lovick
as 2:2011cv00220
Plaintiff:
Michael Francis Moynihan, Jr
Defendant:
John Lovick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moynihan v. Snohomish County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2011cv00219
Plaintiff:
Michael Francis Moynihan, Jr
Defendant:
Snohomish County Sheriff's Office and Snohomish County Sheriff's Office Corrections Bureau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hart v. Exmor Capital et al
as 4:2010cv05421
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hart
Defendant:
Exmor Capital, Michael Francis, James Mariano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Hart v. Exmor Capital et al
as 3:2010cv05421
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hart
Defendant:
Exmor Capital, Michael Francis, James Mariano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
State of Washington v. Moynihan
as 2:2010mc00137
Plaintiff:
State of Washington
Defendant:
Michael Francis Moynihan, Jr
Moynihan v. McKenna
as 2:2010cv00769
Petitioner:
Michael Francis Moynihan, Jr
Respondent:
Rob McKenna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robert Kerson, et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al
as 10-80089
Plaintiff - Respondent:
ROBERT KERSON, FREDERICK ROZO, MICHAEL FRANCIS AYERS and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC. and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Robert Kerson, et al v. LG Display Co., Ltd., et al
as 10-80087
Plaintiff - Respondent:
ROBERT KERSON, FREDERICK ROZO, MICHAEL FRANCIS AYERS and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
LG DISPLAY CO., LTD., LG DISPLAY AMERICA, INC., AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
