Cases 61 - 70 of 73
Gregory Rideau, Jr. v. L. Minnick, et al
as 10-55151
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY SYLVESTER RIDEAU, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
L. MINNICK, Accountant I Supervisor, S. BABRICH, Correctional Guard, S. BABICH, Correctional Guard and others
Gregory Ridean, Jr. v. L. Minnick, et al
as 09-56763
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY SYLVESTER RIDEAN, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
L. MINNICK, Accountant 1 Supervisor, S. BABRICH, Correctional Guard, L. KNAPP, Accountant Technician and others
Cornell Mitchell v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2009cv07491
Petitioner:
Cornell Mitchell
Respondent:
California Department of Corrections, California Correctional Center and R. Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wessel v. Barnes
as 2:2009cv02720
Petitioner:
Aron Ezra Wessel
Respondent:
R. Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hands v. California Correction Center et al
as 3:2009cv04583
Petitioner:
Anthony L. Hands
Respondent:
California Correction Center and R. Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rideau v. Minnick et al
as 3:2009cv00296
Plaintiff:
Gregory Sylvester Rideau, Jr.
Defendant:
L Minnick, S Babich, L Knapp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conner v. Barnes
as 2:2009cv01994
Petitioner:
Cedric W. Conner
Respondent:
R Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Barnes
as 2:2009cv00774
Petitioner:
William Joseph Brown
Respondent:
R Barnes
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mulvey v. Barnes
as 2:2009cv00448
Petitioner:
Dennis C Mulvey
Respondent:
R Barnes
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Alonso v. Barnes
as 4:2009cv00429
Petitioner:
Sergio Omardiaz Alonso
Respondent:
R. Barnes
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
