Cases 61 - 70 of 82
Nichols v. Richardson et al
as 1:2018cv00350
Defendant:
Thompson, John P Barroso, Bollman and others
Plaintiff:
Dominique Nichols
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. County of Benewah et al
as 2:2018cv00320
Defendant:
Bryan Dickenson, Sr., Deputy Pacione, Benewah County and others
Plaintiff:
Darren Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sittre v. Ramirez et al
as 1:2018cv00175
Plaintiff:
Shawn Richard Sittre
Defendant:
Alberto Ramirez, Susan Wessels, Timothy Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson et al v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv00443
Plaintiff:
Brian Richardson and Susan Richardson
Defendant:
Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. , Conceptus, Inc. , Essure and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Banks v. Pivnichny et al
as 1:2015cv00189
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Timothy Pivnichny, James Comey, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ritter v. Reinke et al
as 1:2013cv00509
Plaintiff:
James Daron Ritter
Defendant:
Brent Reinke, Randy Blades, Eugene Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vitale v. Song et al
as 1:2013cv00326
Plaintiff:
Zachariah Vitale
Defendant:
Song, Scott Lossmann, Matt Valley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCormack v. Everest National Insurance Company et al
as 1:2013cv00318
Defendant:
Everest National Insurance Company, Christopher E Caldwell, Ronda K Nichols and others
Plaintiff:
Robert James McCormack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCormack v. Harvey et al
as 1:2013cv00178
Plaintiff:
Robert James McCormack
Defendant:
Donald Harvey, Michael Johnson, Jay Christensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seamons v. Turner et al
as 1:2013cv00119
Plaintiff:
Gregory L. Seamons
Defendant:
Kerri Turner, Debbie Richardson, Deputy Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
