Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 61 - 70 of 74
United States of America et al -v- Gilead Sciences, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00941
Plaintiff: United States of America , State of California , State of Delaware and others
Defendant: Gilead Sciences, Inc. , Gilead Sciences Limited (GSL), Gilead Sciences ULC and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
United States Of America et al v. Genentech, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00822
Plaintiff: United States Of America , State of California , Colorado and others
Defendant: Genentech, Inc., OSI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
National Marine Fisheries Serv v. FERC
as 09-70770
Petitioner: NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICES
Respondent: FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF CONNECTICUT, STATE OF DELAWARE and others
Amicus Curiae - Pending: COASTAL STATES ORGANIZATION
The State of Washington, Depar v. FERC
as 09-70477
Petitioner: THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY
Respondent: FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF CONNECTICUT, STATE OF DELAWARE and others
Amicus Curiae - Pending: COASTAL STATES ORGANIZATION
Columbia Riverkeeper, et al v. FERC
as 09-70442
Petitioner: COLUMBIA RIVERKEEPER, SIERRA CLUB, LANDOWNERS AND CITIZENS FOR A SAFE COMMUNITY and others
Respondent: FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF CONNECTICUT, STATE OF DELAWARE and others
Amicus Curiae - Pending: COASTAL STATES ORGANIZATION
State of Oregon v. FERC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-70269
Petitioner: STATE OF OREGON, by and through it's Department of Environmental Quality, Department of Land Conservation and Development, and Department of Energy
Respondent: FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF CONNECTICUT, STATE OF DELAWARE and others
Amicus Curiae - Pending: COASTAL STATES ORGANIZATION
George Mothershed v. Justices of the Supreme Court, et al
as 08-17570
Plaintiff - Appellant: GEORGE LLOYD MOTHERSHED, I, pro se
Defendant - Appellee: JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT, CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF ARIZONA, SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION and others
United States of Amercia et al v. CV Therapeutics, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv04986
Plaintiff: United States of Amercia, State of California, State of Delaware and others
Defendant: CV Therapeutics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Type: Other Statutes None
The State of California et al v. Winbond Electronics Co.
as 3:2007cv02589
Plaintiff: The State of California, The State of Alaska, The State of Arizona and others
Defendant: Winbond Electronics Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
In Re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2007md01827
Defendant: Toshiba Mobile Display Company, Ltd., Sony Corporation, Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Tammy Long, Judd Eliasoph, Robert Harmon and others
Intervenor: Leah Nylen, Chris Donnelly, State of Mississippi and others
Special Master: Martin Quinn, Mr. Daniel Weinstein and Fern M Smith
Not Classified By Court: Julius N. Dunmore, Jr., Stefan Rest, Dale Keena and others
Counter Defendant: Rockwell Automation Inc., Sony Computer Entertainment America, LLC, Acer America Corporation and others
Interested Party: Douglas C. Giordan, Joseph M. Alioto, Alexandra Brudy and others
Counter Claimant: LG Display Co., Ltd. and LG Display America, Inc.
Amicus Curiae: State of South Carolina and State of California
Claimant: Tiffany and Company, CA Technologies, Inc., American University and others
Trustee: Charles W Daff
Petitioner: Fanshawe College of Applied Arts and Technology
3Rd Party Defendant: Ricoh Electronics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?