Cases 61 - 70 of 115
Moore v. Smelcer et al
as 3:2015cv05577
Plaintiff:
Wendy Moore
Defendant:
James Smelcer , Tamara Buddle-Vlasyuk, Alexander Vlasyuk and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Smelcer v. Buddle-Vlasyuk et al
as 3:2015cv05386
Plaintiff:
James Smelcer
Defendant:
Tamara Buddle-Vlasyuk, Alexander Vlasyuk, Anthony Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Amedee et al v. Xerox Business Services, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00880
Plaintiff:
Treascia Amedee , Isaac D Arias , Rigoberto Botello and others
Defendant:
Xerox Business Services, LLC, Livebridge, Inc., Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Wollander v. Colvin
as 2:2015cv00130
Plaintiff:
Tamara Idele Wollander
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rackley v. Colvin
as 2:2015cv00745
Plaintiff:
Tamara Elsbeth Rackley
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Mowat Construction Company et al v. Dorena Hydro LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00437
Plaintiff:
Mowat Construction Company and United States of America
Defendant:
Dorena Hydro LLC and Westchester Fire Insurance Company
Objector:
Cooper Zietz Engineers, Inc. and Tamara Schurian
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Mowat Construction Company et al v. Dorena Hydro LLC et al
as 2:2015mc00026
Plaintiff:
Mowat Construction Company and United States of America
Defendant:
Dorena Hydro LLC and Westchester Fire Insurance Company
Objector:
Cooper Zietz Engineers, Inc. and Tamara Schurian
Summers v. Glebe et al
as 3:2015cv05102
Plaintiff:
Duane Lee Summers
Defendant:
Pat Glebe, Glen Davis, James Alif and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nasekos v. Colvin
as 2:2013cv01935
Plaintiff:
Tamara Dawn Nasekos
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jasper v. Colvin
as 2:2013cv05099
Plaintiff:
Tamara Jasper
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
