Cases 61 - 70 of 5,473
Aguda v. United States Government and Affiliates
as 2:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
Alih Philip Aguda
Defendant:
United States Government and Affiliates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Skerbeck v. Olympic Medical Center et al
as 3:2024cv05169
Plaintiff:
Mallorie Skerbeck
Defendant:
Olympic Medical Center, Peninsula Emergency Services, Inc., North Olympic Healthcare Network and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Dods v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv05170
Plaintiff:
Amanda Dods
Defendant:
United States of America and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447 Petition for Hearing on Naturalization Application
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00260
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00262
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Parr v. Baumgardner Law Office et al
as 2:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Victoria A Parr
Defendant:
Baumgardner Law Office, United States of America and Bush Law Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00224
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
