Cases 61 - 70 of 81
John G. Westine v. U.S. of America
as 2:2009cv06943
Petitioner:
John G. Westine, Jr.
Respondent:
U.S. of America and U.S. of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Huynh v. Hubbard et al
as 2:2009cv01979
Plaintiff:
Tai Huynh
Defendant:
Susan Hubbard, Mike McDonald, Tom Felker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Gust Westine v. Joseph Norwood
as 2:2008cv03254
Respondent:
Joseph Norwood
Petitioner:
John Gust Westine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
John G. Westine v. Joseph Norwood
as 2:2008cv04766
Petitioner:
John G. Westine, Jr.
Respondent:
Joseph Norwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Diane Westin v. Fred Nitowski et al
as 2:2008cv03925
Plaintiff:
Diane Westin
Defendant:
Fred Nitowski, Gwen Nitowski and John Nitowski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
John G Westine v. United States of America
as 5:2008cv00598
Petitioner:
John G Westine
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
John Gust Westine v. Joseph Norwood
as 2:2007cv06710
Petitioner:
John Gust Westine, Jr
Respondent:
Joseph Norwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Habte v. Westin St. Francis Hotel
as 4:2007cv04516
Plaintiff:
Abraham Habte
Defendant:
Westin St. Francis Hotel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
John G Westine v. United States of America
as 2:2007cv05723
Petitioner:
John G. Westine, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
United States of America v. John G Westine
as 2:2007cv04667
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
John G Westine, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355 Petition for Return of Property
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
