Cases 61 - 70 of 1,146
Papkov v. O'Malley et al
as 3:2024cv01100
Plaintiff:
Aleksey V. Papkov
Defendant:
Martin OMalley, SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF) and Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Killian v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Killian
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Valladares v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv05025
Plaintiff:
Sandra Valladares
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Whitney v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03054
Plaintiff:
Charlie James Whitney
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Henderson v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03055
Plaintiff:
Jonah Myckel Henderson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lathrop v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00565
Plaintiff:
Laurianne V. Lathrop
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley and SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Saltalamachia et al v. Martin O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01725
Defendant:
James Saltalamachia, Commissioner of SSA Martin O'Malley, Martin J. O'Malley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Contreras v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03023
Plaintiff:
Ryanne H Contreras
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ganz v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv05023
Plaintiff:
Carl W Ganz and Carl William Ganz
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Buren v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Kurt Buren
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
