Cases 71 - 80 of 132
Fjerstad v. United States of America, et. al.
as 3:2014cv01305
Defendant:
Barron Bridgett, J. Calloway, Brian Clayton and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Fjerstad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jamisi Calloway v. Frederic Baker, et al
as 14-16352
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMISI JERMAINE CALLOWAY
Defendant - Appellee:
FREDERIC S. BAKER, LEILANIE LASOLA, SCOTT J. DREXEL and others
Jamisi Calloway v. Rangel, et al
as 14-16294
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMISI JERMAINE CALLOWAY
Defendant - Appellee:
RANGEL, Sergeant, PYLE, Correctional Officer, TOMES, Correctional Officer and others
Jamisi Calloway v. Hayward, et al
as 14-15659
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMISI JERMAINE CALLOWAY
Defendant - Appellee:
HAYWARD, C/O and OAKS, C/O
Jamisi Calloway v. D. Adams, et al
as 14-15451
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMISI JERMAINE CALLOWAY
Defendant - Appellee:
D. G. ADAMS, Warden, JEFFREY J. WANG, M.D., SHULTS, Dietician and others
Calloway et al v. Military Recruiting Office et al
as 3:2014cv00126
Plaintiff:
Joseph Calloway and Calloway Carpet Cleaning
Defendant:
Sgt Castaldo and Military Recruiting Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Calloway v. Novo Nordisk Inc.
as 3:2014cv00046
Plaintiff:
Lillian Calloway
Defendant:
Novo Nordisk Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fjerstad v. Clayton et al
as 3:2013cv01898
Defendant:
Barron Bridgett, J. Calloway, Brian Clayton and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Fjerstad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jamisi Calloway v. G. Kelly, et al
as 13-16863
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMISI JERMAINE CALLOWAY
Defendant - Appellee:
G. KELLY, M.D. Psychologist at Corcoran State Prison #1, FLAVIN, M.D. Psychiatric at Corcoran State Prison #1, MARC TALISMAN, M.D. Psychiatric at Corcoran State Prison #1 and others
Jamisi Calloway v. Wang, et al
as 13-16687
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMISI JERMAINE CALLOWAY
Defendant - Appellee:
WANG, Dr., HAYWARD, C/O and OAKS, C/O
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
