Cases 71 - 80 of 260
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv08002
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rathjen v. Litton Loan Servicing LP et al
as 2:2011cv01779
Plaintiff:
Tanya Rathjen
Defendant:
Litton Loan Servicing LP , Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, Soundview Home Loan Trust 2005-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv07250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv01301
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Antonio Marin v. General Electric Money Bank FSB et al
as 2:2011cv05765
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, Does, General Electric Money Bank FSB and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Marin
Leopoldo De Jesus v. Litton Loan Servicing LP et al
as 8:2011cv01048
Defendant:
CR Title Services Inc, CitiMortgage Inc, Does 1 through 50 and others
Plaintiff:
Leopoldo De Jesus
Coslow et al v. Intohomes, LLC et al
as 3:2011cv00480
Plaintiff:
Daniel Coslow and Julie Coslow
Defendant:
First American Title, Norma Gonzalez, Intohomes, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Silsby v. Litton Loan Servicing LP
as 3:2011cv00477
Plaintiff:
Amy L. Barnes and Eric R. Silsby
Defendant:
LSI Title Company, Litton Loan Servicing LP, Litton Loan Servicing LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Silsby et al v. Ownit Mortgage Solution, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00476
Plaintiff:
Amy L. Barnes and Eric R. Silsby
Defendant:
LSI Title Company, Litton Loan Servicing LP, Ownit Mortgage Solution, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Steve Alfino et al v. Litton Loan Servicing LP et al
as 5:2011cv01034
Plaintiff:
Laura Alfino and Steve Alfino
Defendant:
Clearvue Opportunity XV LLC, FCI Lender Services, Litton Loan Servicing LP and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
