Cases 71 - 80 of 101
Myers et al v. McKesson Corporation
as 3:2013cv03096
Plaintiff:
Samona Myers , Gloria Neimark , Maria Nickerson and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Robert Ruffin v. A. Hedgpeth, et al
as 12-17583
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT RUFFIN
Respondent - Appellee:
A. HEDGPETH and BRENDA CASH
James Ruffin v. Aerotek Inc et al
as 2:2012cv08301
Defendant:
Aerotek Inc, Does and L 3 Communications Corporation
Plaintiff:
James Ruffin
Carter et al v. Trump Ruffin Commercial LLC
as 2:2012cv01681
Plaintiff:
Kathy Carter and Richard Carter
Defendant:
Trump Ruffin Commercial LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ruffin v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2012cv00459
Respondent:
Nevada Attorney General and Nevada, State Of
Petitioner:
Gistarve Ruffin, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ventrella v. Trump Ruffin Tower I, LLC dba Trump International Hotel Las Vegas
as 2:2012cv01450
Defendant:
Trump Ruffin Tower I, LLC
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ventrella
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ruffin v. State Of Nevada et al
as 3:2012cv00368
Respondent:
Nevada Attorney General and Nevada, State Of
Petitioner:
Gistarve Ruffin, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Christine Nickerson et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv05052
Defendant:
AstraZeneca PLC, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Kay Mitchell, Willie Mitchell, Blanca Moreno and others
Petitioner:
John Moulton
Gistarve Ruffin, Jr. v. Jack Palmer
as 12-70893
Petitioner:
GISTARVE RUFFIN, Jr.
Respondent:
JACK PALMER
Kevin Ruffin v. Director Nevada Department of, et al
as 11-17680
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEVIN TYRONE RUFFIN
Respondent - Appellee:
DIRECTOR NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
