Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 71 - 80 of 963
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv07356
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv07309
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Sanabria-Dominguez, et al. v. Garland
as 22-1658
Petitioner: ANA BEATRIZ SANABRIA-DOMINGUEZ, ALDRIN ESTUARDO MARTINEZ-SANABRIA and JOSHUA DANIEL MARTINEZ-SANABRIA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Stansberry v. Enter U.S Attorney General Merrick G. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00216
Plaintiff: Lee Roy J. Stansberry
Defendant: Enter U.S Attorney General Merrick G.
Wifunke v. Garland
as 22-1594
Petitioner: AJANI LARRY WIFUNKE
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Melchor Limpin v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 22-55879
Plaintiff / Appellant: MELCHOR KARL T. LIMPIN
Defendant / Appellee: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, In His Official Capacity, LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Former U.S. Attorney General, PORTER, Immigration and Customs Enforcement ("ICE") Officer and others
Vargas Sanchez v. Garland
as 22-1584
Petitioner: JESSICA YUNUEN VARGAS SANCHEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Carrillo Carrillo, et al. v. Garland
as 22-1569
Petitioner: KATALINA CARRILLO CARRILLO and SARA NAYELI CARRILLO CARRILLO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Flores-Medina v. Garland
as 22-1556
Petitioner: RAUL A. FLORES-MEDINA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Oliva-Posuelos, et al. v. Garland
as 22-1563
Petitioner: EVA ROSARIO OLIVA-POSUELOS and DANIEL ALEJANDRO SANCHEZ-OLIVA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?