Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 71 - 80 of 20,173
(HC) Darty v. Warden
as 2:2024cv02192
Petitioner: Kory Darty
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Caldwell v. Warden
as 2:2024cv02194
Petitioner: Adam Jay Caldwell
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carutlerse v. Warden et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv01515
Defendant: Warden, F.M.W.C.C and Staff/Officer
Plaintiff: Kapri Carutlerse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alonso Mendez-Mendoza v. Warden, FCI-Victorville One
as 5:2024cv01727
Petitioner: Alonso Mendez-Mendoza
Respondent: Warden, FCI-Victorville One
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Earley v. Voss et al
as 3:2024cv00364
Defendant: Grievance Coordinator at NNCC, Warden NNCC, Voss and others
Plaintiff: Marc A. Earley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vincent v. Mims
as 3:2024cv01340
Petitioner: Richard A. Vincent
Respondent: Warden Charles Mims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. McKay, et al.
as 24-4967
Defendant: BAKER, C/O, DIETZ, Assistant Warden, KLINGENSMITH and others
Plaintiff: KENT WILLIAMS
Swiger v. Birkholtz
as 24-4971
Respondent: BRIAN BIRKHOLTZ, Warden
Petitioner: DONALD RAY SWIGER, JR.
DeMocker v. Shinn, et al.
as 24-4984
Respondent: DAVID SHINN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, JEFF VAN WINKLE, Warden, Arizona State Prison - Florence and STEPHEN MORRIS, Warden, Arizona State Prison-Eyman Complex
Petitioner: STEVEN CARROLL DEMOCKER
Flournoy v. Pollard, et al.
as 24-4953
Defendant: RALPH DIAZ, Former CDCR Secretary, M. POLLARD, Warden, Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility, KILOUGH and others
Plaintiff: BENJAMIN FLOURNOY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?