Cases 81 - 90 of 31,705
(HC) Martin v. Price
as 1:2024cv00565
Petitioner:
Robert E Martin
Respondent:
Brandon Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Butsch v. Bennett
as 24-3017
Petitioner:
CLAYTON E. BUTSCH
Respondent:
JASON BENNETT, Superintendent, Stafford Creek Corrections Center
United States of America v. April et al
as 3:2024cv00826
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kathleen April, Arthur E. Bailey, James M. Becker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
P. et al v. Beech-Nut Nutrition Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv02828
Plaintiff:
D.P.U, D. M. P., Annie Pompa Morejon and others
Defendant:
Beech-Nut Nutrition Company, Inc., Gerber Products Company, Plum PBC doing business as Plum Organics and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Uquiche-Nahui, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2960
Petitioner:
JULIO CESAR UQUICHE-NAHUI, MIRIAM JUDITH GONZALES-BONIFACIO and J. E. U.G.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Williams v. Steadman et al
as 3:2024cv00816
Plaintiff:
Shadale Lewis Williams
Defendant:
Terrance Steadman, Fred Sedighi, K. Franco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03842
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Allen v. O'Malley
as 24-2927
Plaintiff:
SUSAN E. ALLEN
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
