Cases 81 - 90 of 3,223
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Juan Chavez v. State Actor Conduct Does et al
as 2:2024cv00823
Plaintiff:
Juan Chavez and Juan Padrone Chavez
Defendant:
State Actor Conduct Does, John Doe No 1, Jane Doe No 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chavez v. American Express Company, et al.
as 24-505
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUAN PABLO CHAVEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY, HIGH YIELD SAVINGS, CASH APP INVESTING, LLC and others
(PC) Valera v. Chavez et al
as 2:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
Joel Valera
Defendant:
D. Chavez, M. Stenner, A. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oseguera-Chavez v. Breitenbach et al
as 3:2024cv00047
Petitioner:
Mark Oseguera-Chavez
Respondent:
Nethanjah Breitenbach and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nazario Chavez v. Zera Financial LLC et al
as 8:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
Nazario Chavez
Defendant:
Zera Financial LLC and Luis A. Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hill v. Diaz, et al.
as 24-450
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN T. HILL
Defendant / Appellee:
RALPH DIAZ, JIM BONNIFIELD, Community Resource Manag., official capacity and individual capacity, B. LAYES, Office Technician, official and individual capacity and others
Gonzalez Chavez v. Garland
as 24-348
Petitioner:
ELIAZAR GONZALEZ CHAVEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Chavez v. Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
David Chavez
Defendant:
Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Chavez-Martin v. Garland
as 24-294
Petitioner:
GUMERCINDO CHAVEZ-MARTIN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
