Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 81 - 90 of 715
Emery v. Nooth et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv01070
Defendant: Lt. R. A. Young, M. Andrews, A. Houston and others
Plaintiff: Robert Lee Emery, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sir Giorgio Clardy v. Tracie McFarlane, et al
as 19-35530
Defendant / Appellee: MARK NOOTH, RONNIE FOSS, CRAIG PRINS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: SIR GIORGIO SANFORD CLARDY
Brandon Walker v. Colette Peters, et al
as 19-35485
Defendant / Appellee: GARTH GULICK, M.D., (SRCI), MARK NOOTH, Acting Eastside Director Oregon Department of Corrections (ODOC), JOHN DOES, All, (ODOC/SRCI) and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: BRANDON LEE WALKER
Johnny Zybach v. State of Oregon, et al
as 19-35343
Respondent / Appellee: DESCHUTES COUNTY, MARK NOOTH, ANGELOZZI, Mr.; Superintendent, D.O.C. A.I.P. and others
Petitioner / Appellant: JOHNNY MICHAEL ZYBACH
Martinez v. Short et al
as 2:2019cv00570
Defendant: Troy Bower, S. Boston, Mark Nooth and others
Plaintiff: Michael M. Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Coon v. Mark Nooth
as 19-35280
Petitioner / Appellant: JAMES BYRON COON
Respondent / Appellee: MARK NOOTH, Superintendent, Snake River Correctional Institution
Culver v. Nooth et al
as 2:2019cv00492
Plaintiff: Patrick Culver
Defendant: Mark Nooth, Bob Martinez and Troy Bowser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Theron Hall v. Mark Nooth We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-35248
Petitioner / Appellant: THERON D. HALL
Respondent / Appellee: MARK NOOTH
Nicky Chavez v. Colette Peters, et al
as 19-35244
Defendant / Appellee: FRANK SERRANO, MARK NOOTH, J. PARKS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: NICKY CHAVEZ
Matthew Daniels v. Casey Cleaver, et al
as 19-35231
Defendant / Appellee: CASEY CLEAVER, RHONDA GORE, STEPHEN COOK and others
Defendant: TAMMY GREINER, C. CLEMENTS, COLLETTE PETERS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: MATTHEW RYAN DANIELS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?