Cases 81 - 90 of 145
Gray v. Office Depot, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv06239
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Gray
Defendant:
Office Depot, Inc. , Roger Weber and Steven Burns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Howard Provine v. Office Depot, Inc.
as 12-80218
Plaintiff - Respondent:
HOWARD DAVID PROVINE, individually and on behalf of other persons similarly situated
Defendant - Petitioner:
OFFICE DEPOT, INC.
State of California et al v. Office Depot Inc
as 2:2012cv09952
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Baldwin Park Unified School District, City of Azusa, City of Colton and others
Intervenor:
County of Santa Clara
Defendant:
Office Depot Inc
Plaintiff:
David Sherwin and State of California
McDowell v. Office Depot, Inc.
as 3:2012cv05815
Plaintiff:
James McDowell
Defendant:
Office Depot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Sims v. Office Depot, Inc.
as 3:2012cv05339
Plaintiff:
Tina Sims
Defendant:
Office Depot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fair Labor Standards Act
Salazar v. Office Depot, Inc.
as 4:2012cv05244
Plaintiff:
Dee Salazar
Defendant:
Office Depot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fair Labor Standards Act
Johanna Isom v. Office Depot, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv08098
Defendant:
Kyle Boyd, Does and Office Depot, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Johanna Isom
Office Depot, Inc. v. Zuccarini
as 3:2006mc80356
Plaintiff:
Office Depot, Inc.
Receiver:
Michael Blacksburg
Intervenor:
Network Solutions, LLC and United States of America
Defendant:
John Zuccarini doing business as Country Walk
Not Classified By Court:
DS Holdings, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01958
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012at01025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.