Cases 81 - 90 of 110
In Re Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM) Antitrust Litigation
as 4:2002md01486
Plaintiff:
Oracle America, Inc., Petro Computer Systems, Inc., Ashley Pritchett and others
Intervenor:
Maurice Shelly, Daniel Anthony Weymouth, Patrick J. Simpson and others
Not Classified By Court:
norman d palmer, Norman D. Palmer, Bryan Marcus and others
Defendant:
Korea Development Bank, Hyundai Heavy Industries, Co., Ltd., NEC Electronics Corporation and others
Petitioner:
Unisys Corporation, JACO Electronics, Inc, All American Semiconductor Inc. and others
Not Yet Classified:
Charter Township of Clinton Police & Fire Retirement System, Chemical Valley Pension Fund of West Virginia, Kimball Electronics Tampa, Inc. FKA Reptron Electronics, Inc. and others
Interested Party:
Celestica Corporation
Special Master:
Charles B. Renfrew
Claimant:
Oak Point Partners, Inc.
Respondent:
Chip-Tech, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Natural Resources Defense Coun, et al v. James Perry, et al
as 18-15475
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC., SIERRA CLUB, CONSUMER FEDERATION OF AMERICA and others
Defendant:
JAMES R. PERRY, in his official capacity as Secretary of Energy and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant:
AIR-CONDITIONING, HEATING, & REFRIGERATION INSTITUTE
UC Regents, et al v. USA, et al
as 18-80037
Plaintiff - Respondent:
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, JANET NAPOLITANO, In her official capacity as President of the University of California, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
State of New York, et al v. FCC, et al
as 18-70692
Petitioner:
STATE OF NEW YORK, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF CONNECTICUT and others
Intervenor - Pending:
NCTA-THE INTERNET & TELEVISION ASSOCIATION, CTIA - THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION, USTELECOM-THE BROADBAND ASSOCIATION and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
NRDC, et al v. James Perry, et al
as 18-15380
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC., SIERRA CLUB, CONSUMER FEDERATION OF AMERICA and others
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES R. PERRY, in his official capacity as Secretary of Energy and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Intervenor-Defendant:
AIR-CONDITIONING, HEATING, & REFRIGERATION INSTITUTE
State of California et al v. Teikoku Seiyaku Co., Ltd. et al
as 3:2018cv00675
Plaintiff:
State of California , State of Alabama , State of Arkansas and others
Defendant:
Teikoku Seiyaku Co., Ltd. and Teikoku Pharma USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
State of California et al v. Pruitt et al
as 3:2017cv06936
Plaintiff:
State of California , State of New York , State of Connecticut and others
Defendant:
E. Scott Pruitt and United States Environmental Protection Agency
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7413
In re: USA, et al v. USDC-CASF
as 17-72917
:
In re: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DONALD J. TRUMP, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DONALD J. TRUMP, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Real Party In Interest:
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, JANET NAPOLITANO, In her official capacity as President of the University of California, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
California v. Trump
as 3:2017cv05895
Plaintiff:
State of California , State of Connecticut , State of Delaware and others
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump
Amicu:
Americas Health Insurance Plans , Nancy Pelosi , Steny H. Hoyer and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of California v. Health and Human Services et al
as 3:2017cv05783
Plaintiff:
State of California , State of Delaware, Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Defendant:
Health and Human Services , Department of Labor , Secretary of United States Department of Labor and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
