Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Steven Dipaola v. Physical Rehabilitation Network, LLC et al
as 8:2018cv01781
Plaintiff:
Steven Dipaola
Defendant:
Does, 1 through 10, inclusive, Physical Rehabilitation Network, LLC and DOES 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tanya McDaniel v. USA, et al
as 17-15128
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TANYA GRACE MCDANIEL
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CITY OF DAVIS, California, CITY OF DAVIS POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
McDaniel v. United States Department of Justice, et al.
as 2:2015cv01664
Plaintiff:
Tanya Grace McDaniel
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Davis Police Department, David Pendrose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marino et al v. Coca Cola Company, The et al
as 4:2014cv04356
Plaintiff:
Michelle Marino and Damiano Dipaola
Defendant:
The Coca Cola Company and Coca Cola Refreshments USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDaniel v. The United States, et al
as 2:2014cv02213
Plaintiff:
Tanya McDaniel
Defendant:
The United States, City of Davis, California, City of Davis Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IN RE: COCA-COLA PRODUCTS MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION (NO. II)
as 4:2014md02555
Plaintiff:
George Engurasoff , Joshua Ogden , Julia Hughes and others
Defendant:
Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc. , The Coca-Cola Company , Coca-Cola Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daniel Dipaola et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 2:2011cv06818
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dipaola and Rachel Dipaola
Defendant:
Doe and General Motors LLC
Dipaola et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank
as 4:2011cv02605
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Dipaola and Kimberley Dipaola
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Dipaola et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank
as 3:2011cv02605
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Dipaola and Kimberley Dipaola
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
